Voter guideStatewide measures
Statewide measure · every Colorado voter

Proposition 137Direct Sporting Goods Sales Tax Revenue for Conservation

Placed on the ballot by citizen initiative • Passes with a majority vote. Blue Book page 64 (the printed page number; your PDF viewer's page count runs higher).

In plain words

Colorado already collects sales tax when people buy or rent sporting goods, such as bikes, golf gear, hunting, fishing and camping gear, boats and RVs. Proposition 137 would send that money to parks, wildlife, wildfire prevention, watersheds (the land that feeds rivers and water supplies) and outdoor recreation. It does not raise the tax. Because the money would not count under TABOR (the state constitution's cap on how much the state can keep), taxpayers would get smaller refunds in years the state collects more than the cap. source: Blue Book, p. 64

Before and after

QuestionTodayIf Proposition 137 passes
Where does sales tax on sporting goods go?The state's general budget, which the legislature spends each yearConservation, wildfire, watershed and outdoor programs
How much money?Not set asideAbout $175.0 million in the 2027-28 budget year and $180.2 million in 2028-29 and later years
Does it count under the TABOR cap?YesNo
How much do these programs get from the state now?About $114 million a yearAbout $175 million a year more
Biggest single shareNot applicableGreat Outdoors Colorado (GOCO), up to $83.1 million in 2027-28
Change to the price of sporting goods or the tax rateNot applicableNone

From the official analysis source: Blue Book, p. 64

Example

Illustration only: the Blue Book expects the measure to wipe out one kind of TABOR refund (the six-tier sales tax refund) in at least the 2027-28 budget year. That is $26 to $83 less for a single filer, and $52 to $166 less for a married couple filing together, depending on income. source: Blue Book, p. 64

Biggest change

Who it affects most: Taxpayers, who would get smaller TABOR refunds in years the state collects more than the cap, and the outdoor and wildfire programs that would get the money.

Cost to the state: About $175.0 million in the 2027-28 budget year and $180.2 million in 2028-29 would move out of the state's general budget to these programs. The Blue Book expects TABOR refunds to drop by $175.0 million in tax year 2027.

Our plain-words summary at an 8th-grade reading level. Every line points to its source.

Related case study: TABOR: voter control, public revenue, and Colorado's ballot choices (initial draft, not independently reviewed).

What your vote means

YES

Sales tax from sporting goods, about $175 million in 2027-28, would go to conservation, wildfire and outdoor programs and would not count under the TABOR cap.

NO

Sales tax from sporting goods would stay in the general budget and under the TABOR cap, to be spent as the legislature decides or refunded when required.

Our plain-words summary.

The Blue Book's official wording of YES and NO (tap to open)

YES: A “yes” vote on Proposition 137 directs existing sales tax revenue collected from sales of sporting goods to be spent on certain conservation, wildfire risk mitigation, and outdoor recreation programs, and exempts it from state revenue limitations.

NO: A “no” vote on Proposition 137 keeps the sales tax revenue collected from sporting goods in the state’s general budget and subject to the state’s revenue limit, with the revenue either spent on priorities decided annually by the legislature or refunded to taxpayers when required.

Why people want it, and why others object

Why this is on the ballot

Why supporters want it

Why opponents object

Who backs each side

Most totals are through October 4, 2026 (Rocky Mountain Voice, Oct 6); some are as of September 21 (Colorado Politics). Spending grows until Election Day. These figures come from news reports of state campaign finance filings and were not checked line by line against the filings.

Sources: Rocky Mountain Voice, Oct 6, 2026 · Colorado Politics, Sept 25, 2026 · Colorado Secretary of State: committees for and against 2026 measures · TRACER campaign finance search

Supporter and opponent arguments are the official ones printed in the Blue Book, written by the Legislative Council's nonpartisan staff after hearing from both sides. Who is registered for and against (Secretary of State) . We don't endorse either side.

At a glance

Our plain-words summary of the official Blue Book analysis. Every line points to its source.

Who it affects

How many: The Blue Book estimates $175.0 million would be directed in budget year 2027-28 and $180.2 million in 2028-29, rising in later years. These programs now get about $114 million. It does not count how many households get TABOR refunds.

Money: economic and budget impact

If it passes

State sales tax already collected on sporting goods (such as bikes, golf, hunting, fishing and camping gear, boats, RVs, and equipment rentals) would go to conservation, wildfire, watershed and outdoor recreation programs, starting with the 2027-28 budget year. That money would not count toward the TABOR limit, so refunds would be smaller in years with a surplus. This changes state statute, so the legislature can amend it later.

If it fails

Sales tax from sporting goods stays in the state's general budget and under the TABOR limit. The legislature decides each year how to spend it, or it is refunded to taxpayers when required.

Not yet known

Can it actually be enforced?

Short answer: Mostly yes. Voters can approve letting the state keep revenue above the TABOR limit, and state agencies and GOCO would spend the money. But it is a statute, the amount can shrink in some years, and it interacts with Proposition NN.

Not yet known

This is our reading of the cited law, not legal advice. Court outcomes are uncertain.

Official ballot wording

Official ballot wording, word for word (tap to open)

The ballot title, word for word from the 2026 Blue Book.

Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes creating new law to increase water and land conservation funding without raising taxes, and, in connection therewith, through a voter-approved revenue change, allowing the state to keep and spend a portion of revenue from the state sales tax on sporting goods and equipment to conserve and protect Colorado’s water, land, and forests, prevent wildfires, support outdoor recreation training and activities, and reduce revenue spent on these conservation purposes if necessary to preserve funding for certain tax credits?

The official analysis

The full Blue Book analysis, word for word (tap to open)

Everything in this section is quoted from the nonpartisan Legislative Council's 2026 State Ballot Information Booklet (the Blue Book). Charts are described in words. Read the full Blue Book (PDF)

Proposition 137 proposes amending the Colorado statutes to:

  • direct a portion of existing sales tax revenues from purchases and rentals of sporting goods to be used for certain conservation, wildfire risk mitigation, and outdoor recreation programs; and
  • exempt that money from the state’s constitutional revenue limit, reducing the amount of money collected above the limit that is returned to taxpayers.

Summary and Analysis of Proposition 137

What does Proposition 137 do?

The measure requires that state sales tax revenue collected from purchases and rentals of sporting goods be spent on certain programs. These include:

  • conservation programs that support parks, open spaces, and wildlife;
  • wildfire risk management and mitigation, forest management and restoration, and a fund for damages that may arise from prescribed fires;
  • watershed restoration projects;
  • outdoor education and recreation programs; and
  • outdoor access and equity improvements, which could include programs that give opportunities to underserved youth and families.

The measure applies to most sporting goods categories and does not change the price of sporting goods or the amount of tax collected. Sporting goods include bicycles, golf equipment, hunting and fishing equipment, camping equipment, boats, recreational vehicles, and campers. It also includes rental services for recreational, sports, and fitness equipment.

The measure exempts this portion of state sales tax revenue from the state’s constitutional revenue limit, known as the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) limit. The amount directed to these efforts will be calculated by Legislative Council Staff, the nonpartisan research agency of the General Assembly. For state budget year 2027-28, this is currently estimated to be $175 million.

Will this measure apply to sporting goods revenue in all future years?

In some years, the measure will not direct the full amount of sales tax revenue collected from sporting goods to the identified purposes. This would occur if exempting the revenue from the TABOR limit would reduce two state tax credits available to low- and moderate-income households.

How will the revenue be used?

The measure is estimated to direct about $175 million per year towards the identified conservation purposes, which would be in addition to the approximately $114 million that those efforts currently receive. This amount includes only the specific programs that receive increased funding under the measure and does not include other existing funds for general conservation efforts. The estimated distribution of sales tax revenue directed by the measure is shown in Figure 1 and discussed below.

  • Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO). About $83.1 million would be dedicated to GOCO, an organization established in the state constitution that funds parks, trails, and wildlife projects through grants to local governments, the state, and other conservation efforts. GOCO is funded by the state lottery, amounting to about $90 million annually, and currently receives no state funding from taxes.
  • Wildfire risk mitigation, forest management, and watershed restoration projects. About $83.1 million would be dedicated to these efforts per year. In budget year 2027-28, a one-time investment of $10.0 million would be made out of the total funding available to pay for damages that may arise from the use of prescribed fires. These wildfire risk mitigation and forest management efforts currently receive about $16.4 million annually from the state, which is largely awarded through grants from state agencies for fuels reduction in forests and other risk mitigation projects near developed areas. Watershed restoration projects and water projects reducing risk of post-wildfire floods currently receive about $5 million annually from the state.
  • Outdoor recreation, economic development, and equity programs. The remaining revenue, about $8.7 million, would be dedicated to outdoor recreation and equity programs funded through the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade and Colorado Parks and Wildlife. These programs currently receive about $800,000 from the state annually. The funding is used to support outdoor industry business advancement and outdoor recreation planning for rural communities, and to provide grants to organizations and projects improving access and representation for youth and their families in the Colorado outdoors.

More information is included in the Fiscal Impact section below.

Figure 1: Sales Tax Revenue Distribution under Proposition 137 for State Budget Year 2027‑28 (millions of dollars). This chart is in the printed Blue Book on page 66. The amounts are listed in the text above and in Table 1 below.

How does the measure affect TABOR refunds?

TABOR limits state government revenue available for spending to an amount adjusted annually for inflation and population growth. Revenue collected over the limit must be refunded to taxpayers unless voters approve a measure to allow the government to keep and spend it. Under this measure, the dedicated sales tax revenue would be exempt from the TABOR limit. In years where state revenue exceeds the limit, the measure reduces TABOR refunds by the amount of sporting goods sales tax revenue the state is allowed to keep. In years where state revenue is below the TABOR limit, the measure does not impact TABOR refunds, but it may reduce the amount of money available for other general budget priorities.

For more information, see the Legislative Council Staff memorandum titled “A Brief Overview of the TABOR Revenue Limit.”1

Arguments For Proposition 137

1) Without increasing tax rates or changing the cost of sporting goods, the measure directs needed money to recreation access, protects land from development, mitigates wildfire risk, and safeguards watersheds. Competing priorities squeeze the state budget, federal support is unreliable, and the state has not kept up with necessary investments to improve the environment and outdoor economy for residents and visitors. The measure funds trusted programs like GOCO, which has supported conservation projects statewide for over 30 years.

2) Colorado’s outdoor spaces are under strain with more visitors, ongoing drought, and more frequent and devastating wildfires. These pressures threaten communities, water resources, and recreational spaces. This measure provides a user-based model for supporting the outdoors, protecting our

Online at: leg.colorado.gov/bluebook

communities from wildfire, and restoring watersheds. Residents and visitors who rent or buy sporting goods often use them in outdoor-related activities, making them natural stakeholders in protecting Colorado’s lands, water, and wildlife. Linking spending to conservation ensures that those who benefit most from the outdoors help sustain it.

Arguments Against Proposition 137

1) This measure is a tax increase in disguise because it reduces or eliminates future TABOR refunds. Keeping state revenue subject to the current constitutional limit is a critical taxpayer protection that is continuously being undermined. Allowing the state to keep even more taxpayer money has the same effect as taxpayers paying higher taxes. Every dollar retained under this measure is a dollar less in either tax refunds or spending on other critical state priorities like health care and education.

2) This measure directs more money to organizations and government entities with specific interests and limited accountability to the legislature or voters. As many of these programs already have dedicated, reliable funding sources, siphoning additional state dollars to these programs reduces the ability of the state to respond to changing conservation needs as best practices evolve. State legislators already have the power to spend money to meet these needs and should have the flexibility to balance their budget priorities without being constrained by this measure. Information about the organizations supporting and opposing this measure is available on the Colorado Secretary of State's website:

www.coloradosos.gov/pubs/elections/Initiatives/ballot/contacts/2026.html

Fiscal Impact of Proposition 137

The measure transfers an estimated $175.0 million in the 2027-28 budget year, and increasing amounts in later years, from the state General Fund to pay for various programs related to forest restoration, wildfire mitigation, conservation, and outdoor recreation. It reduces TABOR refunds in years when revenue exceeds the TABOR limit.

State Revenue

The measure transfers an estimated $175.0 million in the 2027-28 budget year and $180.2 million in 2028-29 and future budget years for use on specified programs. This money would otherwise be available for the general state budget or refunded to taxpayers. The transferred revenue is divided between programs within GOCO (47.5 percent), Colorado State Forest Service and the Department of Natural Resources (47.5 percent), Colorado Parks and Wildlife (2.5 percent), and the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (2.5 percent).

The amount transferred may be reduced in years where the transfer would result in the reduction of certain income tax credits for families.

State Spending

The measure increases state spending by up to an estimated $175.0 million in budget year 2027-28 and $180.2 million in budget year 2028-29, and by increasing amounts in future years assuming sporting goods sales growth. Some funds may not necessarily be spent in the year they were received. Potential spending under the measure is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Potential Change in State Spending Under Proposition 137 (Blue Book p. 68)

UseBudget Year 2027‑28Future Year 2028‑29
Great Outdoors Coloradoup to $83.1 millionup to $85.6 million
Colorado State Forest Serviceup to $36.5 millionup to $42.8 million
Department of Natural Resourcesup to $36.6 millionup to $42.8 million
Department of Public Safety$10.0 million$0
Colorado Parks and Wildlifeup to $4.4 millionup to $4.5 million
Office of Economic Development & International Tradeup to $4.4 millionup to $4.5 million
Total Spendingup to $175.0 millionup to $180.2 million

In years where state revenue collections are below the TABOR limit, the measure will reduce state money available for other uses (the three largest of which are health care, education, and human services); however, the exact effect of the measure on other programs will depend on budgeting decisions by the state legislature. In years where state revenue collections are above the TABOR limit, the measure has no impact on other state spending, but has impacts to taxpayers as described below.

Taxpayer Impacts

The measure will decrease the amount refunded to taxpayers in years when state revenue is over the TABOR limit. Based on forecasts from June 2026, the measure is expected to decrease refunds by $175.0 million in tax year 2027. Refunds in tax year 2028 are outside the forecast window. The impact on taxpayers depend on how this money would be refunded. The measure is expected to eliminate six-tier sales tax TABOR refunds in at least the 2027-28 budget year, by between $26 and $83 per single filer and between $52 and $166 per joint filer, with the actual amount dependent on income level.

Interactions with Other Measures

Proposition NN allows the state to keep and spend revenue that would otherwise be refunded to taxpayers under TABOR, up to a newly established limit. Because Proposition 137 reduces revenue subject to the constitutional revenue limit, Proposition 137 will reduce the amount of money the state actually keeps and spends under Proposition NN, if both measures pass.

Latest news

Recent reporting from a range of outlets, newest first. We link to it; we don't endorse it.

Coverage of all the statewide measures

What people are saying

Official campaign accounts on each side, and public posts. Links only: nothing here loads from social media sites. We link to posts; we don't endorse them.

Supporters (yes)

Protect Colorado's Land and Water, Prevent Wildfires
Website · Bluesky

  • 2026-10-12 Bluesky, @yesonprop137.bsky.social: “We're pleased to have Senator Michael Bennet join the hundreds of Coloradans who have endorsed Prop 137.” view
  • 2026-10-08 Bluesky, @yesonprop137.bsky.social: “Congressman Joe Neguse says “Yes” on Prop 137!” view
  • 2026-10-08 Bluesky, @yesonprop137.bsky.social: “Prop 137 was endorsed by the Durango Herald and Cortez Journal.” view
Opponents (no)

No official campaign accounts listed yet.

Other voices

Full text of the measure

Word for word from the Blue Book, pages 95 to 99 (PDF ). Where the measure changes existing statutes, new wording is in CAPITAL LETTERS, as in the printed booklet.

Show the full text

Read more