Voter guideStatewide measures
Statewide measure · every Colorado voter

Amendment 84Mail Ballot Voter Identification

Placed on the ballot by citizen initiative • Passes with 55 percent of the vote. Blue Book page 24 (the printed page number; your PDF viewer's page count runs higher).

In plain words

Amendment 84 would require people voting by mail to write the last four digits of an ID number with their ballot, along with signing the envelope. The number can come from a Social Security number, a Colorado driver's license, or a Colorado ID card that meets the federal Real ID standard. If the number is missing or does not match, the county must contact the voter. The ballot counts only if the voter fixes it within eight days after Election Day. source: Blue Book, p. 24

Before and after

QuestionTodayIf Amendment 84 passes
What must a mail voter provide?A signature on the envelopeA signature, plus the last 4 digits of a Social Security number, Colorado driver's license, or Colorado ID card
How is the ballot checked?The signature is compared to the one on fileThe signature check, plus the ID number is matched to voter records
If there is a problem, how long does the voter have to fix it?8 days after Election Day8 days after Election Day. The voter can also send a copy of an accepted ID, a U.S. passport, a U.S. military ID, or a tribal photo ID, in person or online.
ID rules for voting in personNo changeNo change
Which elections?Not applicableFederal and statewide elections
Cost to state and local governmentsNo added cost today. The cost at right is what this measure would addUp to $2.7 million in budget year 2026-27, then $1.2 million a year

From the official analysis source: Blue Book, p. 24

Example

Illustration only: The Blue Book says counties would spend up to $2.5 million in budget year 2026-27. The state pays back about 45 percent of county costs, up to $1.1 million that year. That leaves counties paying roughly $1.4 million themselves. source: Blue Book, p. 24

Biggest change

Who it affects most: Mail voters, who cast 92 percent of all ballots in Colorado in 2024, and the county election offices that would check the numbers.

Cost to the state: Up to $2.7 million for the state and counties together in budget year 2026-27, then $1.2 million a year after that. The state's share has usually been paid from Department of State fees, not the General Fund (the state's main account for everyday spending). Business filing fees may go up to cover it.

Our plain-words summary at an 8th-grade reading level. Every line points to its source.

What your vote means

YES

Mail voters must add the last four digits of an accepted ID number to their ballot, on top of their signature.

NO

Mail ballots keep being checked by signature only.

Our plain-words summary.

The Blue Book's official wording of YES and NO (tap to open)

YES: A “yes” vote on Amendment 84 requires voters to provide identification information with their mail ballot, in addition to their signature.

NO: A “no” vote on Amendment 84 continues the current signature-only verification system for mail ballots.

Why people want it, and why others object

Why this is on the ballot

Why supporters want it

Why opponents object

Who backs each side

Totals are from the state campaign finance filings (TRACER), through October 14, 2026, pulled October 25, 2026. Spending grows until Election Day.

Sources: Rocky Mountain Voice, Oct 6, 2026 · Colorado Politics, Sept 25, 2026 · Colorado Secretary of State: committees for and against 2026 measures · TRACER campaign finance search · Governing, Sept 2026 · Colorado Politics, Oct 2, 2026

Supporter and opponent arguments are the official ones printed in the Blue Book, written by the Legislative Council's nonpartisan staff after hearing from both sides. Who is registered for and against (Secretary of State) . We don't endorse either side.

Follow the money

Amendment 84 has the clearest money trail of any Colorado measure this year. The table below comes straight from the state's campaign finance filings (TRACER), pulled October 25, 2026. It covers reports through October 14, 2026 (filed October 19).

Who gaveWhere based (per filing)AmountDateSource
Coalition for American Prosperity & Growth, Inc.Colorado Springs, CO$725,00006/01/2026TRACER, committee ID 20265052101, pulled Oct 25, 2026
Coalition for American Prosperity & Growth, Inc.Colorado Springs, CO$725,00006/18/2026
Coalition for American Prosperity & Growth, Inc.Colorado Springs, CO$750,00007/01/2026
A Public VoiceMcLean, VA$1,000,00009/11/2026
American Jobs and Growth FundAlexandria, VA$1,000,00009/11/2026
American Prosperity CaucusEuless, TX$2,400,00010/01/2026

Receiving committee: Colorado Voter Trust Initiative (supports Amendment 84, mail ballot voter identification). Through October 14, 2026 it reported $6,600,000 in contributions and $5,750,055 in spending, with $849,945 left.

Our math: the six gifts add up to $6,600,000, which matches the committee's reported total. By the addresses in the filing, $4,400,000 is from outside Colorado (Virginia $2,000,000 and Texas $2,400,000) and $2,200,000 is from a Colorado Springs group. Filings do not say who funds these groups.

How sure are we? Each claim, checked October 25, 2026

ClaimStatusWhat we knowSources
The yes committee has raised $6.6 million through October 14.Official sourceSix contributions in the committee's filings add up to $6,600,000, matching its financial summary.TRACER, 20265052101
$4.4 million of it is from outside Colorado.Official sourceDonor addresses in the filing: McLean VA, Alexandria VA, Euless TX. The rest ($2.2 million) lists a Colorado Springs address.TRACER, 20265052101
The $2.2 million donor is named Coalition for American Prosperity & Growth, Inc.Official sourceThe filing uses this name. Governing and Colorado Politics each gave a different name, and Governing placed the group in Ohio. The filing lists Colorado Springs.TRACER, 20265052101
American Jobs and Growth Fund is funded by Club for Growth.One source onlyStated by one outlet. We have not found a second source or a filing.Colorado Politics, Oct 14
The opposing committee has raised $236,000 through October 14.Official sourceDefend Our Ballots Issue Committee: five contributions add up to $236,000, all from Colorado addresses. Defend Our Ballots 501(c)(4), Denver, gave $161,000 in three gifts; John Powers of Boulder gave $50,000; Merle Chambers of Denver gave $25,000. It reported $75,000 in spending. Earlier news reports had put it at $0.TRACER, 20265052411
The measure would cost the state and counties up to $2.7 million in 2026-27, then about $1.2 million a year.Official sourceFrom the nonpartisan Legislative Council fiscal estimate in the Blue Book.2026 Blue Book (PDF)

Status key: Official source a government document. One source only or News reports only treat as unconfirmed.

Correction history

Check it yourself: search TRACER for the committee 'Colorado Voter Trust Initiative' and read its contributions list. If you find a difference from this page, tell us and it goes in the log above. Open TRACER

At a glance

Our plain-words summary of the official Blue Book analysis. Every line points to its source.

Who it affects

How many: Every Colorado voter gets a mail ballot for federal and statewide elections, and in 2024, 92 percent of all ballots cast in Colorado were mail ballots. The Blue Book does not say how many voters lack an accepted ID number or how many ballots might go uncounted.

Money: economic and budget impact

If it passes

For federal and statewide elections, mail voters must add the last four digits of an accepted ID number, on top of signing the envelope. If the number is missing or does not match, the county must contact the voter, who has eight days after election day to fix it, in person or digitally. ID rules for in-person voting do not change. Because it is a constitutional amendment, changing it later would take another statewide vote.

If it fails

Mail ballots stay under signature-only checks. Counties compare the envelope signature to the voter's signature on file. If two election judges from different parties agree it likely does not match, the county contacts the voter, who has eight days after election day to confirm their identity.

Not yet known

Can it actually be enforced?

Short answer: The state can largely carry it out, since states run their own election procedures. But federal voting law sets some limits, and lawsuits over rejected ballots are possible.

Not yet known

This is our reading of the cited law, not legal advice. Court outcomes are uncertain.

Official ballot wording

Official ballot wording, word for word (tap to open)

The ballot title, word for word from the 2026 Blue Book.

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution requiring a voter to sign and include the last four digits of their social security number or their Colorado driver’s license or identification card number on the outside of their mail ballot for any federal or state election, and, in connection therewith, allowing the voter to correct missing or incorrect information, including with alternative forms of identification; and prohibiting a county clerk and recorder from counting the mail ballot unless the problem is fixed?

The official analysis

The full Blue Book analysis, word for word (tap to open)

Everything in this section is quoted from the nonpartisan Legislative Council's 2026 State Ballot Information Booklet (the Blue Book). Charts are described in words. Read the full Blue Book (PDF)

Amendment 84 proposes amending the Colorado Constitution to:

  • require voters to provide identification information, in addition to their signature, for their mail ballots to be counted.

Summary and Analysis of Amendment 84

What does this measure do?

For federal and statewide elections, the measure requires voters to include the last four digits of a government-issued identification number when submitting their mail ballot. Acceptable forms of identification are a social security number, a Colorado driver’s license number, or a Colorado identification card number. Any form of Colorado identification provided must be compliant with the federal Real ID law. This new verification process created by the measure is in addition to the current signature verification process for mail ballots.

If a voter’s identification information is missing or cannot be matched to the state voter registration database, the county election office must contact the voter to tell them how to correct the discrepancy. Consistent with the existing signature verification process, the ballot will not be counted unless the voter takes steps within eight days of election day to confirm their identify. Specifically, a voter may submit a copy of one of the forms of identification allowed under the measure. Alternately, a voter may provide a copy of a U.S. passport, a U.S. military identification card, or a tribal photo identification card. During this process, identification may be provided in-person or digitally. Voters with qualifying physical disabilities or elderly voters who are entitled under federal law to vote by mail may submit a broader range of acceptable forms of identification.

What is the role of mail ballots in Colorado elections?

Every Colorado voter receives a mail ballot for federal and statewide elections. Coloradans can vote by returning their mail ballot at a drop box or through the mail, or they may vote in person at any voter service and polling center in their county. In 2024, 92 percent of all ballots cast in Colorado were mail ballots, most of which were returned to a drop box.

How are mail ballots verified under current law?

Colorado currently uses signature verification to determine that mail ballots come from eligible voters. When a voter returns a mail ballot, they must sign the envelope. Once the ballot is received by the county election office, the signature on the envelope is then compared to the voter’s signature on file from election and driver’s license records. If a signature discrepancy is found, the signature is then reviewed by two election judges of different political parties. If they both agree that the signature likely does not belong to the voter, the county election office must contact the voter to have them confirm their identity and that they submitted the ballot. If the voter does not confirm their identity within eight days after election day, the ballot is not counted.

Does the measure affect the allowable forms of identification for in‑person voting?

No. The measure does not change the forms of identification that may be presented when voting in person at a voter service and polling center. The allowable forms of identification for in-person voting are broader than those required for mail ballots under this measure, including documents that show a person’s name and address.

Argument For Amendment 84

1) Additional voter verification for mail ballots strengthens election security while preserving convenient access to voting. Government-issued identification documents are more consistent and less subjective than the current signature verification process. Most voters already have an eligible identification card, or know their social security number. If a voter does not have one of the required forms of identification to complete their mail ballot, they can choose to vote in person using several identification options. Adding a convenient form of additional verification for mail ballots promotes public confidence that ineligible ballots will not be counted.

Argument Against Amendment 84

1) The measure adds an unnecessary burden to voting, without meaningfully improving election security. The measure could result in eligible voters’ ballots not being counted due to minor mistakes when submitting their mail ballot. Further, voters who have privacy concerns about providing sensitive information when submitting their ballot or who are unable to produce the required identification will be discouraged from using mail ballots, which is Colorado's most commonly used and convenient method of voting. The current signature verification process is effective, secure, and convenient for voters and it successfully identifies the rare cases when ineligible individuals attempt to submit a mail ballot.

Information about the organizations supporting and opposing this measure is available on the Colorado Secretary of State's website:

www.coloradosos.gov/pubs/elections/Initiatives/ballot/contacts/2026.html

Fiscal Impact of Amendment 84

The measure will increase state and local spending by up to $2.7 million in the initial budget year 2026-27, and $1.2 million annually in future years for voter outreach, printing, and election staff to verify voter information. These costs will be divided between state and local governments as discussed below.

Local Government Spending

The new verification process under the measure will increase county spending by up to $2.5 million in the 2026-27 budget year and up to $1.2 million in future years. About 45 percent of these county costs will be reimbursed by the state government. These costs are driven from several new requirements under the measure. First, election judges must review identification numbers provided by voters, which will increase staffing hours and overtime during elections. Second, county election offices must notify voters of any discrepancies involving their identification information, which will require sending a postcard or digital notification to voters and segregating ballots until valid identification is provided. Lastly, county election offices will also be required to update ballot materials and envelopes, modify various elections systems, and conduct voter outreach.

State Spending

The Department of State will have increased costs to inform voters of the changes to mail voting across the state and to reimburse counties. Specifically, the department will need to conduct an outreach and communication campaign at a cost of $100,000 in state budget year 2026-27 and $200,000 in state budget year 2027-28. The department will also have ongoing workload and costs for outreach and printed materials estimated at $20,000 for each presidential primary, statewide primary, and general election. As discussed above, the state will also have costs to reimburse counties for a portion of their costs under the measure. This reimbursement is estimated to be up to $1.1 million in during the 2026-27 budget year, and up to $500,000 for in future years. Historically, these costs have been paid using fees and other revenue collected by the department, rather than from the state General Fund.

State Revenue

To cover the costs in the Department of State discussed above, business filing fees may need to be raised to cover all or some of the costs of this measure. The fees affected, the timing of any increase, and the actual amount of fee charges will be set administratively by the department based on its available fund balance and total program costs.

Latest news

Recent reporting from a range of outlets, newest first. We link to it; we don't endorse it.

Coverage of all the statewide measures

What people are saying

Official campaign accounts on each side, and public posts. Links only: nothing here loads from social media sites. We link to posts; we don't endorse them.

Supporters (yes)

No official campaign accounts listed yet.

Opponents (no)

No official campaign accounts listed yet.

Full text of the measure

Word for word from the Blue Book, pages 70 to 71 (PDF ). Where the measure changes existing statutes, new wording is in CAPITAL LETTERS, as in the printed booklet.

Show the full text

Read more