New Hampshire voter guideConstitutional Amendment Questions
Question · every New Hampshire voter

Question 1: Register of probateRemove the unused office of register of probate from the constitution

Legislative referral (constitutional amendment): CACR 13 (2026), placed on the ballot by the Legislature as Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13 (CACR 13), 2026 . Passes with two-thirds (2 out of every 3) of the votes cast on the question.

What is word for word and what is ours. The ballot question below is copied word for word from the Secretary of State list of 2026 ballot questions (PDF). The "Today" column, the YES and NO lines, the two-thirds pass rule (from the bill text) and the background are our summary. The testimony quote and the 2022 vote figure are from earlier research and were not re-opened.

In plain words

Each county used to elect a "register of probate," an official who kept records for the probate court (the court that handles wills, estates and guardianships). In 2011 the state reorganized its courts and moved that work to clerks of the circuit court. The office still exists in the constitution with almost nothing to do. This amendment removes it. Voters were asked a similar question in 2022; it got about 63% yes but needed two-thirds. (The 2022 vote figure is from our earlier research and was not re-opened.) (news.ballotpedia.org )

Before and after

QuestionTodayIf it passes
Register of probate in the constitutionListed as an elected county officerRemoved
Who does the probate court's record workCircuit court probate division clerks (since 2011)Circuit court probate division clerks (same)
Rule against acting as a lawyer in probate casesCovers judges and registers of probateCovers judges only

Our summary; the sources it draws on are linked on this page.

Biggest change

Who it affects most: County voters, who would no longer see a register of probate race on the ballot, and the people now elected to the office.

Cost to the state: Unknown. No cost estimate was found. A former register testified that the office now pays $100 a year.

Our plain-words summary. Every line points to its source.

What your vote means

YES

The register of probate, a county office with no duties since 2011, is removed from the state constitution.

NO

The register of probate stays in the constitution as an elected county office.

Our one-line summary. Check the official list of questions or your sample ballot for the exact wording.

Why people want it, and why others object

Why this is on the ballot

The Legislature put this on the ballot. It changes the state constitution, so only another statewide vote can change it back. It passes with two-thirds (2 out of every 3) of the votes cast on it.

Why supporters want it

Why opponents object

Who backs each side

In each side's own words where we could find them, quoted or summarized with a link to the source. We don't endorse either side.

What you will see on your ballot

Official ballot wording, word for word (tap to open)

The official ballot title, word for word from the Secretary of State's list of ballot questions .

Are you in favor of eliminating the office of register of probate by amending articles 71 and 81 of the second part of the constitution to read as follows: [Art.] 71. [County Treasurers, County Attorneys, Sheriffs, and Registers of Deeds Elected.] The county treasurers, county attorneys, sheriffs and registers of deeds, shall be elected by the inhabitants of the several towns, in the several counties in the State, according to the method now practiced, and the laws of the state, provided nevertheless the legislature shall have authority to alter the manner of certifying the votes, and the mode of electing those officers; but not so as to deprive the people of the right they now have of electing them. [Art.] 81. [Judges Not to Act as Counsel.] No judge shall be of counsel, act as advocate, or receive any fees as advocate or counsel, in any probate business which is pending, or may be brought into any court of probate in the county of which he or she is judge.

Yes
No

Copied word for word from the Secretary of State's "2026 General Election" list of ballot questions (PDF), page 1, Question 1 (the text inside the quotation marks). The PDF prints this after the question: (Passed by the N.H. House 325 Yes 15 No; Passed by the Senate 23 Yes 1 No) CACR 13. It prints Yes and No as the choices. Question 2 on that page (Statutory Question required by HB 1300, Chapter 324, 2026, a school tax-growth question) is asked only in towns that put it on their ballot, so it is not a full guide page here. Its official wording, copied word for word from the same PDF (the bracketed names are filled in by each town): “Shall the [name of municipality] limit property tax growth for [name(s) of school district(s)] under RSA 32:5-i? If adopted for a two-year period: (1) the local property tax levy may not grow beyond the prior year’s amount, adjusted for inflation and new construction; (2) SAU central office spending may not exceed 6 percent of total school district appropriations; and (3) bonded capital costs are excluded from both limits. These caps apply only to administrative operations of the SAU central office and do not affect classroom instruction, school-based services, or other municipal expenditures. These limits may be overridden as provided in RSA 32:5-i. Adoption requires a three-fifths (3/5) majority vote.” It prints Yes and No as the choices.

Latest news

Recent reporting from a range of outlets, newest first. We link to it; we don't endorse it.

No articles collected yet for this measure.

Full text of the measure

Bill status page (gc.nh.gov): the bill title is "relating to registers of probate. Providing that the office of register of probate and all references to such office be eliminated." (summary read). The change is to Part II, Articles 71 and 81 of the New Hampshire Constitution (City of Dover sample ballot, summary read). Read it in the Secretary of State's list of questions on the 2026 general election ballot (PDF) , or on the Legislature's page for Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13 (CACR 13), 2026 , which also shows the votes in each chamber.

Read more

We link to analysis from several sources; we don't endorse it.